News
How Neuroscience Can Unlock the Future of AI-Powered Literacy
StudyFetch, the AI-powered educational platform serving over 6 million students worldwide, recently hosted the Enduring Literacy Symposium at the University of Pennsylvania. This event gathered some of the brightest minds in learning sciences to discuss the impact of AI in literacy.
Currently, the U.S. faces a critical literacy crisis, one with far-reaching consequences for economic mobility, workforce readiness, and social equity. Michael Platt, James S. Riepe University Professor of Marketing, Neuroscience, and Psychology and Director of the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative (WiN), joined a panel of education innovators to examine how AI can meaningfully improve literacy outcomes.
The following takeaways distill Platt’s panel contributions, drawing on decades of neuroscience research and his applied work across education, business, and high-performance environments.
Learning outcomes depend on cognitive and emotional “brain states”
Platt emphasizes that how a student shows up neurologically – stressed, calm, overloaded, confident – shapes their ability to learn as much as the instructional content itself.
“If you are stressed out… that urgency prioritizes speed at the expense of accuracy. It’s not conducive to learning.”
He describes this as the speed–accuracy tradeoff, a fundamental property of the brain: when students feel rushed or anxious, accuracy plummets.
Takeaway:
AI systems that adapt to a student’s emotional or cognitive readiness, not just their skill level, will dramatically improve learning efficiency. Even lightweight assessments (e.g., brief self-check prompts, facial-affect detection with consent, or behavioral cues like response latency) can help tailor pacing, difficulty, and instructional tone.
AI can help reduce cognitive overload
Platt notes that despite having 86 billion neurons, humans operate under surprising processing constraints:
“Our brains are not like computers. Information overload is a real thing.”
Even subtle increases in complexity can overwhelm working memory, reducing comprehension and retention. In neuroscience studies and high-performance settings, simplifying inputs improves decision-making and accuracy.
Takeaway:
AI tutors and literacy tools should prioritize optimal information scaffolding—not dumbing content down, but organizing it so the learner sees only what is needed at each step. This is particularly important when students face dense text, multi-step tasks, or new vocabulary.
Sequencing matters
Platt highlights a lesser-known finding from neuroscience:
“The exact same content lands in the brain completely differently depending on the material you situate around it.”
This phenomenon, rooted in how the brain allocates attention and forms associations, means instructional sequence is not merely logistical, it’s neurological.
Takeaway:
AI-enabled curriculum tools should optimize the order of texts, tasks, and supports to enhance engagement and retention. Rather than treating lessons as independent modules, AI can generate cross-topic coherence, build momentum, and maintain cognitive “flow.”
Trust is the essential (but often overlooked) ingredient
Platt stresses that innovation succeeds only when educators, administrators, parents, and students trust the intentions and integrity of the tools being deployed.
“You have to trust that you are acting in the best interests of the students and of the entire system… We’re all in this together.”
He notes that academic research often fails to translate into practice precisely because it does not address this trust gap.
Takeaway:
Districts and developers must prioritize transparency: how AI makes decisions, what data it uses, and how it supports (not replaces) teachers. Building trust early makes adoption smoother and leads to more sustained use.
AI can restore joy, creativity, and “play” in learning
One of Platt’s most compelling insights: the brain learns best when it is engaged, curious, and emotionally safe.
“If we can alleviate stress… we create conditions that are optimal for learning, resilience, and well-being. Bring back more joy.”
He argues that AI should not merely automate tasks but free educators to create richer human experiences: more movement, more discussion, more exploration.
So what?
Literacy innovation should pair AI efficiency with human connection. The future is not AI versus teachers. It is AI enabling teachers to focus on the relational, motivational, and creative dimensions of learning.